The short answer
A TVDE driver must have a written contract, signed by the parties, with the operator they drive for. Whatever name is given to that contract, article 12 of the Labour Code applies to the relationship, presuming an employment contract exists when certain features are present. The TVDE law also says that cars and other tools rented by the operator count as the operator’s work tools. These rules have been in the law since 2018: Law no. 59/2026 did not change a word of them, only the numbering.
This article explains what the law says. It is not legal advice, and the classification of a specific relationship depends on the facts of each case.
What the law says, and since when
The relevant provisions are in article 10 of the TVDE regime:
- paragraph 2, subparagraph e): the driver must "have a written contract governing the relationship between the parties". It is one of the cumulative requirements for drivers.
- paragraph 16: to the relationship between the TVDE operator and the driver, "set out in a written contract signed by the parties, and regardless of the name the parties have adopted in the contract, article 12 of the Labour Code applies".
- paragraph 17: for that purpose, "work equipment and tools are deemed to be all those belonging to the beneficiary or used by it through rental or any other form of lease".
- paragraph 18: drivers with an employment contract are covered by the working time rules of Decree-Law no. 237/2007; self-employed drivers by those of Decree-Law no. 117/2012.
Compared with the 2018 law: subparagraph e) of paragraph 2 has the same text; the current paragraphs 16, 17 and 18 are the former paragraphs 10, 11 and 12, with identical text. In Law no. 59/2026 they in fact appear only as "[Former paragraph 10.]", "[Former paragraph 11.]" and "[Former paragraph 12.]". Anyone who heard that the new law created the presumption of an employment contract for TVDE drivers heard wrong: the presumption has applied since the TVDE regime came into force, in November 2018.
Article 12 of the Labour Code, in a few words
Article 12 of the Labour Code presumes that an employment contract exists when, in the relationship between someone who carries out an activity and whoever benefits from it, some of a set of features are present. They include the activity being carried out at a place belonging to or chosen by the beneficiary, the work equipment and tools belonging to the beneficiary, the provider keeping start and finish times set by the beneficiary, and a fixed sum being paid at regular intervals in return for the activity.
A presumption is not a certainty. Whoever wants to rebut it can prove that, despite those features, the relationship is not one of subordinate employment. But it reverses the starting point: when the features are present, it is up to whoever denies the employment contract to prove otherwise.
The Labour Code has other provisions on work on digital platforms. This article is limited to what the TVDE law requires to be applied, which is article 12.
Paragraph 17: the rented car counts as the operator’s
The most TVDE-specific provision is paragraph 17 of article 10. One of the features in article 12 of the Labour Code is that the work equipment and tools belong to the beneficiary. In TVDE, the main work tool is the car, and many operators do not own their cars: they rent them, on a lease, long-term rental or other form of hire.
Paragraph 17 prevents that from ruling out the feature. To apply article 12, all tools belonging to the beneficiary "or used by it through rental or any other form of lease" count as its own. A car rented by the operator and handed to the driver is, for this purpose, the operator’s work tool.
The opposite case is the driver who owns the car. With Law no. 59/2026, the owner-driver may assign their car to the activity through an operator by loan-for-use, provided only they drive it (article 12, paragraph 17, of the TVDE regime; explained inown car). In that situation the car is not the operator’s, but the presumption may still arise from other features. The law also says that this loan-for-use exception does not affect labour and social security obligations (article 12, paragraph 20).